Your body decides what your mind is allowed to consider.

Under pressure, the deliberate part of your thinking goes offline first, and the options never reach you. Steady it and everything downstream improves: the questions you ask, the answers you accept, the decisions your team lives with. That part is trainable, and it is measurable.

Carla Burger
I'm a decision scientist. I study how people decide, and what changes when a machine is in the room.
Austin and London.

System 1Your gut
The instant read. You walk into a room and know something is off before anyone says a word. It's fast, it's free, and it's right often enough that you stop checking it.
System 2Your reasoning
The part that slows down, lays out the options and changes its mind. It burns real energy, and your body only pays for it when nothing more urgent is happening.
System 3The machine
AI. It reads more than you ever could and has no view on what matters. It answers whoever asked, in the spirit they asked.

Try it

These three don't take turns politely. How much pressure you're under decides which ones you can reach. Drag the slider.

CalmUnder pressureOverloaded
System 1Always on.On
System 2Working. Slow enough to change your mind.On
System 3You ask it for options and you actually read them.Working for you

You're making a decision.

Where it breaks

Under pressure the slow part goes first. The gut stays, and now it has a research assistant. It asks for a memo and gets one: confident, well sourced, and built around the answer it already had. Nobody in the room experiences this as bad judgment. It feels like moving fast.

Which is why measuring people doesn't fix it. Nobody on your team got worse at thinking. They lost access to it.

About me

I finish an Executive MSc in Behavioural Science at the London School of Economics in December 2026. My work sits between behavioural science and the design of AI systems.

I run Behaviorist, which works on the points where an AI system is allowed to act on its own and where it has to stop and ask a person. Before that I built PeopleNotResumes, which looks at how candidates actually make decisions rather than what their CV claims.

I write here about one problem: what pressure does to judgment, and what happens when a machine is standing by to help.

What is established, and what is not